I've been long sarcastic about claims on AGI(Artificial General Intelligence). Especially on the point that humans will be someday outperformed by them in every task, will have nothing left to do, and the meaning of their lives would be destroyed permanently(Okay, you might think that this is ridiculous already, but there are some singularists actually push this scenario). Out of many reasons to maintain such an opposition, at least one argument seems clear: we humans disagree on being 'better' in general. What is a better painting? Or better music? Or better writing or research paper? As each of us humans has different and mutually exclusive answers to those questions, it seems ridiculous to me for an AGI to produce works that magically appease everyone's preferences. There surely are counterarguments against my opinion, but this writing isn't about AGI after all, so we'll move on. My point is, on a specific task that we could measure and compare the performanc...
Welcome to my workshop! Here you can explore through various projects of mine. That is, as long as I don't forget to upload them:P. All comments will be appreciated! In fact, they are sent directly into my mailbox, so don't hesitate to comment!